Jo-Mamma

And my high end gaming computer performs better. Why do console manufactures have to be so behind?

I think ill pass unless some kick ass exclusive games get released for it.

 

 

So they are using 2 years old technology in the next-gen consoles!

 

 

You two are the usual run-of-the-mill fools... "my computer is faster! because what's wrote on the paper matters!"

Look at it this way: Sony decided to create it's own technology for the PS3, what ended up happening? Lots of issues. Developers struggled to learn the platform, which hindered enormously. In addition, it DROVE prices up for so long. Those are just the surface issues. Compared to what is in the current gen hardware, namely the Xbox 360, these specs are much further ahead of the curve. Should do well for six, to ten years.

That said, the miserably spec'd Xbox 360 is able to play Battlefield 3 perfectly fine, well people with much newer computers STRUGGLE. To name a title off the top of the head.

 

Consoles outsell PC's every day for gaming use. Consoles get more games within one year then the PC will in two years. See where I'm going with this?

Spec's are merely a point of interest, not means to compare to another platform to make decision. 

So think before you spew out garbage. Enjoy upgrading your PC four time during the life-span of one console generation. 

Looks like garbage. You can guns used before the 80's than Mech's that look like they're from the far future *cough* Metal Gear Solid *cough*......

Props for finally doing something different, besides that they clearly don't understand doing things selectively or tastefully.

Love it or hate it. It'll sell millions most likely. But like MW3, I think the fan base will cry and complain shortly after the hype.

Hate or love it. It's hard to say that Apple doesn't make a solid quality product package, period, and it shows in that video, for sure.

Hah! Awesome. Ironically accurate...

Rage much?Me, Mac guy? Ohohoho.. oh stop it, you!Youre so cool with your upgradable Alienware! You said that i meant Laptops in general, YES laptops in general isnt modular. Alienware is hardly a laptop in general (non-common PC). Your argument is invalid. Hardware flexlibility isnt important for me, when did i say that? I just mentioned that laptops in the PC world cant be upgradable either, just RAM. So then we have a logic that fits this image as it applies to Macs too. Macbooks are Macs, right?I ignore some parts of your text. Ignorance is a bless is what they say.

Ohohohoho... oh stop it, you! You're so cool with your sarcastic smart-assery, very clever! It's almost as if you've done this before! *rolls eyes*

I don't recall writing in caps, nor throwing out nasty threats to give you any indication of "rage".

Do some research and educate your ignorance (or was it a bliss?). Apple's current offerings have gone BACKWARDS in user serviceable parts and options. You don't even have the ability to purchase extra batteries or have the ability to swap it out without taking the entire system apart. Far from comparing to "GENERAL" systems as your claiming.

I've owned systems from all sorts of brands, Dell, Alienware, Clevo, Asus, etc. and frankly, everyone of them the CPU, Ram, CD-ROm and Battery were a -MINIMUM- option to upgrade, replace and service. So yes, "General" computers are very much MORE modular then Macs. And by the way, Alienware is very much a "general" brand, considering you can purchase them at best buy and futureshop for the same price if not less then a lower end Mac.

This has nothing to do with Windows or Mac, it's common knowledge if you know anything about hardware. Clearly I'm not the only one challenging your comments.

You were saying so proudly in your own bliss of ignorance?