Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Crysis 3 Benchmark - GPU & CPU Performance Comparison

benchmark crysis

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 pcHuntqwerty

pcHuntqwerty

    QWERTY

  • Member
  • 1,999 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:30 AM

wyHWKma.jpg

 

Crysis 3 is built into CryEngine 3 engine which has been updated with improved dynamic cloth and vegetation, better lighting and shadows, and plenty more. PC gamers had to wait for a high-resolution textures pack for Crysis 2 last year but Crysis 3 launched with high-resolution textures, DX11 support and plenty of customization options that set it apart from the diluted consoles builds.

 

The test was conducted by techspot. They used 18 DirectX 11 graphics card configurations from AMD and Nvidia. The latest drivers will be used, and every card will be paired with an Intel Core i7-3960X to remove CPU bottlenecks that could influence high-end GPU scores.

 

Hardware Specifications Of The Test Machine

  • Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition (3.30GHz)
  • x4 4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 (CAS 8-8-8-20)
  • Gigabyte G1.Assassin2 (Intel X79)
  • OCZ ZX Series 1250w
  • Crucial m4 512GB (SATA 6Gb/s)
  • Microsoft Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
  • Nvidia Forceware 314.07
  • AMD Catalyst 13.2 (Beta 6)

GPU Tested

  • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition (3072MB)
  • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7970 (3072MB)
  • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7950 Boost (3072MB)
  • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7950 (3072MB)
  • AMD Radeon HD 7870 (2048MB)
  • AMD Radeon HD 7850 (2048MB)
  • HIS Radeon HD 7770 (1024MB)
  • HIS Radeon HD 6970 (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 680 (4096MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 680 (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 Ti (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti (2048MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 580 (1536MB)
  • Gigabyte GeForce GTX 560 Ti (1024MB)
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 480 (1536MB)

Medium Quality Performance

 
gHRrx5k.png
 
High Quality Performance
 
3m2wBFj.png
 
Very High Quality Performance
 
fMgMVg2.png
 
CPU Performance
u6FPL9v.png
 
Credit: Test conducted by Techspot


#2 R@6271M3

R@6271M3

    Donnie

  • Member
  • 347 posts

Posted 01 March 2013 - 04:34 PM

Only 37 FPS with a GTX 680? :o

 

"Can it run Crysis" meme is back!



#3 Jatin

Jatin

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • 4,867 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 10:21 AM

It's great to know that Crysis 3 is not a direct console port.

#4 Maximum Payne

Maximum Payne

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 351 posts

Posted 02 March 2013 - 10:33 AM

I Played Crysis 3 and its really nothing to write home about. For me its even worse then C2  in terms of gameplay and level design.

Also switching from low to very high in options doesn't change much...



#5 Shaun of the Seven

Shaun of the Seven

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 897 posts

Posted 08 March 2013 - 09:08 PM

Crysis 2 PC port was crap. I like how smooth Crysis 3 is on PC.



Want to comment?

Register or Sign In to go completely ad-free!



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: benchmark, crysis