Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Skype for Windows introduces ads on Skype-to-Skype calls


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 P.McGinley

P.McGinley

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 965 posts

Posted 14 June 2012 - 08:44 AM

Posted Image

The official Skype blog announced today that it will be putting "Conversation Ads" inside the window of free Skype-to-Skype audio calls on Windows PCs. The ads will only appear for users who don't have a subscription or Skype credit.

Skype is attempting to spin the news as a positive for users, saying that the ads "could spark additional topics of conversation that are relevant to Skype users and highlight unique and local brand experiences." :lol:

#2 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 14 June 2012 - 01:16 PM

Welp, Skype is shit list (Like it wasn't before).

#3 FalseAgent

FalseAgent

    your average joe (tm)

  • Elites
  • 6,444 posts

Posted 15 June 2012 - 10:59 AM

shall stick to oovoo then.

#4 hb860

hb860

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Developer
  • 734 posts

Posted 15 June 2012 - 01:03 PM

It's time to look at something else. I guess I have to start with oovoo.

#5 ThunderROM

ThunderROM

    Super WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 2,574 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 12:44 AM

Why don't people use Google Hangout?

#6 fediaFedia

fediaFedia

    Super WinMatrixian

  • Elites
  • 2,516 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:46 AM

Yes, how dare they put ads on their free service used by millions. After all, developing software, providing server maintenance and bandwidth costs nothing to them.

#7 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 12:22 PM

Yes, how dare they put ads on their free service used by millions. After all, developing software, providing server maintenance and bandwidth costs nothing to them.



It's not just that. There's a lot to say about advertising, but ads have a history of starting off innocent, but end up becoming intrusive and obstructive. Take a look at a typical webpage with AdBlock turned off, especially one running Google's ad network. You have ads all over that it becomes intrusive to user's browsing experience. It didn't used to be that way, but slowly, over time, they've crept up on us.

Now, they're placing ads in our software. Software many live or die by, that to me is unacceptable. I don't need ads junking up my desktop UX. I know developers need to eat too, but in software advertising isn't the way to go. I don't trust ad networks, I don't want to be tracked, or cataloged. I don't know what that little ad is doing behind the scenes, or what kind of data it's sending back home. We have a word for that in the business, that's called adware, and adware is generally frowned upon nowadays.

I installed Skype to talk to people, not be followed around by a sleazy used car salesman.

#8 fediaFedia

fediaFedia

    Super WinMatrixian

  • Elites
  • 2,516 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 01:38 PM


Yes, how dare they put ads on their free service used by millions. After all, developing software, providing server maintenance and bandwidth costs nothing to them.



It's not just that. There's a lot to say about advertising, but ads have a history of starting off innocent, but end up becoming intrusive and obstructive. Take a look at a typical webpage with AdBlock turned off, especially one running Google's ad network. You have ads all over that it becomes intrusive to user's browsing experience. It didn't used to be that way, but slowly, over time, they've crept up on us.

Now, they're placing ads in our software. Software many live or die by, that to me is unacceptable. I don't need ads junking up my desktop UX. I know developers need to eat too, but in software advertising isn't the way to go. I don't trust ad networks, I don't want to be tracked, or cataloged. I don't know what that little ad is doing behind the scenes, or what kind of data it's sending back home. We have a word for that in the business, that's called adware, and adware is generally frowned upon nowadays.

I installed Skype to talk to people, not be followed around by a sleazy used car salesman.

Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?
Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.


In a world dominated by advertisement, you think it's abnormal for the internet to have ads too? There were ads in software ever since the beginning of the internet and they hadn't become any more intrusive than they are now (think toolbars). Skype is a web based service. It's not winrar. If you hate ads so much, why don't you pay for the service then? I have a small amount of skype credit so this change doesn't affect me, but even if it did, I wouldn't make a tragedy of it. This is a small price to pay for this service to continue existing. Hell, even winmatrix probably wouldn't exist if it wasn't for Google ads. As for ad networks, well, I can only say this - make sure to fasten that tinfoil hat on your head, so it doesn't accidentally fall off.

#9 pcHuntqwerty

pcHuntqwerty

    QWERTY

  • Member
  • 1,820 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 03:41 PM

Yes, how dare they put ads on their free service used by millions. After all, developing software, providing server maintenance and bandwidth costs nothing to them.

+1

#10 Borix

Borix

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 763 posts

Posted 19 June 2012 - 01:00 PM

Leave it to MS to mess up good sotware ;)

Want to comment?

Register or Sign In to go completely ad-free!