Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Windows 7 infection rates 5x lower than Windows XP


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 01:54 PM

Posted Image

Still holding out on Windows 7? Don't see any benefit to upgrading? Then, you might wanna give this post a read:

New data extracted from Microsoft's Security Intelligence Report shows that Windows 7 is seeing 5x less infection rates than Windows XP, and about half of what Windows Vista is seeing.

As in previous periods, infection rates for more recently released operating systems and service packs are consistently lower than earlier ones, for both client and server platforms. Windows 7 and Windows ServerĀ® 2008 R2, the most recently released Windows client and server versions, respectively, have the lowest infection rates on the chart.

One reason may be that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts, despite increasing sales of 64-bit Windows versions among the general computing population. Kernel Patch Protection (KPP), a feature of 64-bit versions of Windows that protects the kernel from unauthorized modification, may also contribute to the discrepancy by preventing certain types of malware from operating.


If you're still doubting the authenticity of the report, the below graph has shown that this is not due to Windows 7's infancy, showing there is no clear increase or decrease in infection rates, staying well below 4%.

Posted Image


You can read the Security Intelligence Report here (PDF): Link

#2 Ace Starr

Ace Starr

    the winmatrix addict

  • Member
  • 289 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 06:15 PM

Windows 7 infection rates lower than Windows XP


duh! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I don't think any winXP person is claiming that XP is even comparable to Seven on security front. Come to think of it, I don't think they have any good argument, except maybe the cost of getting a new OS (maybe even a better hardware)

Edited by Ace Starr, 14 May 2011 - 06:17 PM.


#3 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 08:17 PM

I don't think any winXP person is claiming that XP is even comparable to Seven on security front.


Browse around the Internet. You'd be surprised at the amount of crap XP holdouts are slinging around.

#4 pcHuntqwerty

pcHuntqwerty

    QWERTY

  • Member
  • 1,831 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 09:09 PM

This is the worst excuse I read somewhere:
"Windows 7 is new and buggy but Windows XP is tried and tested"

:lol:

#5 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 10:09 PM

They never used it then. Even in pre-beta, and beta stages, Win7 Has been nothing but a blast to use.

But there is so much mis-information out there. There's two wackos running around Neowin claiming that a non-admin account on XP, is just as secure, if not more secure than Win7.

Yeah. Right.

Edited by Frylock86, 14 May 2011 - 10:53 PM.


#6 old5chool

old5chool

    WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 104 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 10:56 PM

Um, Windows XP still more popular than Windows 7 or Vista, so could they make an accurate statistic based on fact?..

#7 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 14 May 2011 - 11:08 PM

Um, Windows XP still more popular than Windows 7 or Vista, so could they make an accurate statistic based on fact?..


Read the bottom of the post. This isn't based on market share, the research was done on a thousand computers per operating system.

#8 InlineSkate

InlineSkate

    WinMatrix Addict

  • Member
  • 3,182 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 12:21 AM


Um, Windows XP still more popular than Windows 7 or Vista, so could they make an accurate statistic based on fact?..


Read the bottom of the post. This isn't based on market share, the research was done on a thousand computers per operating system.


That didn't take long did it. Lol.

#9 FalseAgent

FalseAgent

    your average joe (tm)

  • Elites
  • 6,478 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 05:51 AM

windows XP doesn't come with enough adequate protection out of the box IMO. Windows XP was built back when computers and security were not even a major issue.

#10 pataoengineer

pataoengineer

    @pataoengineer

  • Member
  • 1,155 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 06:32 AM

According to the legend of the charts, it's just Windows7 RTM, isn't it?

#11 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 04:53 PM

windows XP doesn't come with enough adequate protection out of the box IMO. Windows XP was built back when computers and security were not even a major issue.


Exactly. 10 years ago most were still on dial up, and the malware landscape back then wasn't what it is today.

#12 CAS91572

CAS91572

    Active WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 604 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 09:33 PM


windows XP doesn't come with enough adequate protection out of the box IMO. Windows XP was built back when computers and security were not even a major issue.


Exactly. 10 years ago most were still on dial up, and the malware landscape back then wasn't what it is today.


Yeah, the only good thing about dial-up was that you could disconnect from the internet and not worry about any thing happening. Now it's all always on connections. Still, I'll take broadband over dial-up any day!

#13 FalseAgent

FalseAgent

    your average joe (tm)

  • Elites
  • 6,478 posts

Posted 15 May 2011 - 09:57 PM



windows XP doesn't come with enough adequate protection out of the box IMO. Windows XP was built back when computers and security were not even a major issue.


Exactly. 10 years ago most were still on dial up, and the malware landscape back then wasn't what it is today.


Yeah, the only good thing about dial-up was that you could disconnect from the internet and not worry about any thing happening. Now it's all always on connections. Still, I'll take broadband over dial-up any day!

I think we're beyond broadband; Today, we're talking about an "always on" experience anywhere we go.

#14 old5chool

old5chool

    WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 104 posts

Posted 23 May 2011 - 02:24 AM

Read the bottom of the post. This isn't based on market share, the research was done on a thousand computers per operating system.

I don't see it, but cool. The thing is, Windows XP could be shut off from malicious access (manually secured, with fairly simple procedures) and Windows 7 (even more than Vista) simply cannot be - due to interdependent services and interconnected components; & anyway while desktops, etc., will probably be more secure, I doubt that any serious (corporate) business will (ever, God forbid, l0l) run (on) anything (Micro$oft) Windows. ;) :)

#15 Frylock86

Frylock86

    WinMatrixian 1337

  • Member
  • 2,972 posts

Posted 23 May 2011 - 05:25 PM

But, businesses do run on Windows.... :huh:

#16 yadavarun

yadavarun

    New WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 4 posts

Posted 03 June 2011 - 06:19 AM

Posted Image

Still holding out on Windows 7? Don't see any benefit to upgrading? Then, you might wanna give this post a read:

New data extracted from Microsoft's Security Intelligence Report shows that Windows 7 is seeing 5x less infection rates than Windows XP, and about half of what Windows Vista is seeing.

As in previous periods, infection rates for more recently released operating systems and service packs are consistently lower than earlier ones, for both client and server platforms. Windows 7 and Windows ServerĀ® 2008 R2, the most recently released Windows client and server versions, respectively, have the lowest infection rates on the chart.

One reason may be that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts, despite increasing sales of 64-bit Windows versions among the general computing population. Kernel Patch Protection (KPP), a feature of 64-bit versions of Windows that protects the kernel from unauthorized modification, may also contribute to the discrepancy by preventing certain types of malware from operating.


If you're still doubting the authenticity of the report, the below graph has shown that this is not due to Windows 7's infancy, showing there is no clear increase or decrease in infection rates, staying well below 4%.

Posted Image


You can read the Security Intelligence Report here (PDF): Link



#17 yadavarun

yadavarun

    New WinMatrixian

  • Member
  • 4 posts

Posted 03 June 2011 - 06:21 AM

Oh wow that's great, i also use windows 7 right now and now am feeling more secure after knowing this.
Thanks :)

Want to comment?

Register or Sign In to go completely ad-free!