WinMatrix: Windows 7 Gaming Benchmarks - In comparison to XP and Vista - WinMatrix

Jump to content

Sign in to access features such as - Topic subscription, Automatic updates, Personal messages, Manage your profile and more..
Page 1 of 1

Windows 7 Gaming Benchmarks - In comparison to XP and Vista Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   The Silent Warrior Icon

  • Got Orange Stars?
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 2,426
  • Joined: 19-November 05

Posted 25 October 2009 - 03:08 PM

By comparison, Windows 7 feels considerably more snappy, and requires fewer resources. Windows 7 also benefits from the growing pains of Vista, as they largely share the same driver format. For gaming, the biggest concern is video card drivers. In this test, four games are used for the benchmark. Batman Arkham Asylum, Lost Planet, Resident Evil 5, Call of Duty 4.

System Setup: Intel Core i7 920, Intel DX58S0, 3GB DDR3 RAM, Windows Vista SP2 32-bit, Windows XP SP3 32-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive. Graphics Cards: PNY GeForce GTX 280 1GB, Radeon HD 4870 512MB. Graphics Drivers: ATI Catalyst 9.9, Nvidia ForceWare 191.07.

Posted Image

Source: Gamespot

This post has been edited by The Silent Warrior: 25 October 2009 - 03:08 PM

1

#2 User is offline   FalseAgent Icon

  • your average joe (tm)
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 3,692
  • Joined: 23-November 05

Posted 26 October 2009 - 02:51 AM

this is it - windows7 is the final blow to gaming on windows XP!
0

#3 User is offline   Munkypoo7 Icon

  • Proud WinMatrix Member
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 614
  • Joined: 14-May 07

Posted 26 October 2009 - 10:18 AM

While it does show an improvement, graphics drivers aren't fully prepared for 7 yet, many components are still Vista and not just 7 components.

Give it a month, then gaming benchmarks could REALLY mean something...
0

#4 User is offline   K.L.Devine Icon

  • Active WinMatrixian
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 11-August 09

Posted 26 October 2009 - 05:10 PM

Finally! Bye bye XP.
0

#5 User is offline   zool Icon

  • Kohzoku Oni
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 952
  • Joined: 18-March 06

Posted 26 October 2009 - 05:25 PM

Guys, which is better? DX10 in Vista or 7? I played some games using Vista compatibility, and the performance is sucks.. then i switched back to XP compatibility , the games run smoother with maximum settings.. Does this mean DX10 is slower than DX9? I also noticed that games run in Windows 7 are better than XP in my PC..:)
0

#6 User is offline   poolsharkzz Icon

  • XP - 'till the world blows up!
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 402
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 26 October 2009 - 09:09 PM

XP was never made to be a "Gaming Console", surely not to the level that is needed to run today's games well.

This is why XP scored a bit lower - even with the level of hardware technology being equal...

XP as an Operating System was never made to run games of today's standards and quality - that is what your PS3 and XBox 360 is for!

Seriously, you guys need to check out this Thread.

All that upgrade nightmare for what, maybe a 15% - 20% increase in performance?

I got that alone from just upgrading my Ram - not to mention the Processor!

poolsharkzz


Attached File  basketball.gif (27.67K)
Number of downloads: 0

This post has been edited by poolsharkzz: 26 October 2009 - 11:52 PM

0

#7 User is offline   poolsharkzz Icon

  • XP - 'till the world blows up!
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 402
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 26 October 2009 - 11:58 PM

View Postzool, on 26 October 2009 - 12:25 PM, said:

Guys, which is better? DX10 in Vista or 7? I played some games using Vista compatibility, and the performance is sucks.. then i switched back to XP compatibility , the games run smoother with maximum settings.. Does this mean DX10 is slower than DX9? I also noticed that games run in Windows 7 are better than XP in my PC..Posted Image



It all may depend on your hardware specs - is your current system built for gaming and if so, what's under the hood?

poolsharkzz


Attached File  Lion_tamer.gif (36.79K)
Number of downloads: 0

This post has been edited by poolsharkzz: 26 October 2009 - 11:59 PM

0

#8 User is offline   coldemone Icon

  • Expanded Alaria
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 1,856
  • Joined: 11-August 08

Posted 29 October 2009 - 08:33 AM

I thought Xp is for gaming since it leaves the RAM and cpu free of other crappy overloads like how vista did.
0

#9 User is offline   RickSOLET Icon

  • Super WinMatrixian
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 1,403
  • Joined: 30-April 08

Posted 29 October 2009 - 07:55 PM

Quote

Does this mean DX10 is slower than DX9?

It depends upon games. Some games run better in DX10 mode where as Crysis and Far Cry 2 run slower in DX10 mode.
0

#10 User is offline   poolsharkzz Icon

  • XP - 'till the world blows up!
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 402
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 29 October 2009 - 11:17 PM

View Postcoldemone, on 29 October 2009 - 03:33 AM, said:

I thought Xp is for gaming since it leaves the RAM and cpu free of other crappy overloads like how vista did.



While XP has much improved memory management versus older Win 9x systems, Micrososft stepped it up in Vista and Windows 7.

In most circumstances, you should have better performance in newer systems.

poolsharkzz


Attached File  cleaning.gif (4.03K)
Number of downloads: 0
0

#11 User is offline   ayoshi Icon

  • WinMatrixian
  • Icon
  • Group: WM Members
  • Posts: 219
  • Joined: 25-August 09

Posted 30 October 2009 - 11:24 AM

i experience low performance in gaming in vista.

I can't play left4dead 1 smoothly in vista :angry:

but I like the way Vista took care of my files even if I system restore :woot:
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users